State Building and State Fragility Monitor

(2012-…)

 

Coordination

Nuno Canas Mendes

 

Administrator

Tiago Ferreira Lopes

 

Research Team

 

Researchers

Nuno Canas Mendes

Tiago Ferreira Lopes

Moisés Silva Fernandes

Monica Ferro

Pedro Nuno Parreira

Associated Researchers

Reinaldo Saraiva Hermenegildo,

Francisco Pereira Coutinho

Francisco José Serra Briosa e Gala

 

Junior Researchers

André Saramago

Marco Andrea Vallino

 

Interns

Nuno Ferreira

Consultants

Armando Serra Marques Guedes

Gudmund Jannisa

Jarat Chopra

Luis Manuel André Elias

Tanja Hohe

 

Research group

Southeast Asia and South Asia

 


 

 

In the last couple of years there has been a growing interest on the subjects of State building and State fragility; also, the expanding tribe of scholars, practitioners, experts and otherwise interested people in the subject has prompted the appearance of several resources that most of the time are scattered around in research centers, networks, academia, international organizations, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.

Since its inception the “State Building and State Failure Debate in International Relations: The Case of East Timor” research project PTDC/CPO/71659/2006 founded by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) and hosted by the Orient Institute has aimed to be both a hub and a meeting point for researchers, teachers, specialists and the general public on State building and State fragility related matters.

We come now as a Monitor in order to fulfill the core tasks we committed ourselves to in the R&D Project: to contribute to the study of these themes; to facilitate the sharing of experiences and knowledge amongst the community of scholars and practitioners; to disseminate the knowledge products produced by us but also the ones we’ve identified throughout this project’s tenure; and also to promote a wider understanding and interest on the ongoing debate on State building and State fragility.

To these tasks we add now the aim of becoming a hub for further production: connecting people, facilitating knowledge-sharing-experiences and also engaging the general public in the debate, modestly hoping to make a contribution to this field of study.

On conceptual clarity, OECD gives us a hand: taking State building as an ‘endogenous process to enhance capacity, institutions and legitimacy of the State driven by State-society relations’;

State fragility we define as a stadium when ‘State structures lack political will and/or capacity to provide the basic functions needed for poverty reduction, development and to safeguard the security and human rights of their populations’.

In what concerns the concept of ‘State failure’ or ‘Failed States’ we adopt our own definition, according to which, a failed State is a State that has reached an extreme situation of degradation of its internal order. In these cases, the institutional expression of the State itself is found lacking. All of the State’s territory is fragmented between private actors, and all provision of political goods is also private. There isn’t any public order, and the power in society belongs to those that are stronger in any given moment.

The population is a victim of constant abuses and violations of its human rights, the provision of security depends of the favour of the warlords and the economy is nothing more than an informal and private structure, dominated by criminality. We have chosen to apply this concept only to those extreme cases, such as Somalia, in which the State does not possess anymore any practical existence and it continues to be a reality only from a formal point of view thanks to the will of the rest of the rest of the international community.

Please notice that according to our particular conception, there isn’t a relation of linearity between the classification of ‘Fragile States’ and that of ‘Failed State’. These aren’t two stages in a single sequence of linearity in fragility. We instead argue that these are two different phenomena that should not be confused with one another, and that have their own characteristics, that produce different effects to their societies and that imply different responses from the international society.

The Monitor explores different analytical perspectives ranging from crisis prevention to early recovery, to disaster risk reduction and management, to rebuilding without forgetting the contribution of international and regional organizations.

voltar ao topo

Daxiyangguo - Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Asiáticos

Revista de Imprensa Asiática Principais Notícias

  • sexta, 22 setembro 2017 Japão - Filipinas

    The Duterte administration’s economic managers and the Japanese government next week will firm up financing commitments for P315.4 billion in big-ticket infrastructure projects, the Department of Finance said Friday.

     

  • sexta, 22 setembro 2017 Japão

    The Japan Coast Guard will strengthen its training system for JCG officers stationed on Miyakojima island in Okinawa Prefecture, a base for the defence of waters around the Senkaku Islands, known in Taiwan as the Diaoyutai Islands, according to sources.

     

  • sexta, 22 setembro 2017 Coreia do Sul

    According to a survey conducted last month by professor Lim Dong-kyun from University of Seoul, 89.5 percent of some 1,202 respondents said that the new law was effective. Some 45.6 percent said the impact was little, while 5.6 percent said the changes were huge.

     

Ver todas